Disposed

Yogesh Balasaheb Vethekar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC11 Mar 2021WP/1833/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition seeking correction of the mother's name in school records, the High Court held that the Headmaster could not reject the proposal merely due to the student's departure, aligning with the 'Janabai' full bench judgment.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.4 to forward the proposal to Respondent No.2, who shall not reject it due to the petitioner leaving the school, with the Education Officer to act within two months.

Yogesh Balasaheb Vethekar Vs the State of… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

980-wp-1833-20

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 1833 OF 2020

¶5

Yogesh Balasaheb Vethekar ... Petitioner.

¶6

Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ... Respondents.

¶7

Mr. D.B. Rode, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Ms. Surekha Mahajan, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Mr. R.L. Kute, Advocate for Respondent No.4.

¶8

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 11^th MARCH, 2021

¶9

PER COURT :-

¶10

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proposal

¶11

for correction of the name of the mother in the school record is rejected by the Headmaster only.

¶12

We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.

¶13

1 of 3

¶14

980-wp-1833-20 2

¶15

The only reason for the Headmaster in not considering the request of the petitioner is that the petitioner had left the school when the application was given for correction of the name of the mother in the school record. The reliance is placed on Rule 26.4 of the Secondary School Code.

¶16

The full Bench of this Court in case of Janabai D/o Himmatrao Thakur Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others reported in 2020 (1) All M.R. 360 has held that the said provision is directory and obvious mistake can be corrected even after the student has left the school.

¶17

The full Bench of this Court in case of Janabai D/o Himmatrao Thakur (supra) has held that the obvious mistake can be corrected even after the student has left the school. The Headmaster ought to have forwarded the said proposal to the Education Officer. The Education Officer, thereafter has to pass the order and the matter would be referred to the Secondary School Board. The said process was required to be adhered to.

¶18

The Respondent No.4 shall forward the proposal filed by the petitioner for correction in the name of the mother in the school record to Respondent No.2. The Respondent No.2 shall not reject the said proposal only on the ground that the petitioner had left the

2 of 3

980-wp-1833-20

school. The Education Officer shall forward the said proposal, preferably within two (02) months from the date of receipt of the such proposal and thereafter the respondent No.3 shall take necessary decision and steps as per the provisions, preferably within three (03) months.

¶23

The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶24

( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE

¶25

S.P. Rane

¶26

3 of 3

Yogesh Balasaheb Vethekar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogesh Balasaheb Vethekar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Samata Shikshan Sanstha Pune Thr the Secreatry Vilas Ananda Wagh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Satish Narsing Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Akash Piraji Kamble Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Anand Shrirang Jadhav and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Talat Shikshan Mandal Kabadipura Thr Secretary Khan Kutubunnisa Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Secretary and Others

Gajanan Ananda Chikatwad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others