The single judge disposed of the writ petition challenging an interim maintenance order. The judge directed the Family Court to decide the original maintenance application within four months.
Directed the Family Court to decide the original maintenance application within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
criwp162.20
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
904 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.162 OF 2020
PARAG S/O. MANOHAR JAMKHEDKAR VERSUS
DIPTI W/O. PARAG JAMKHEDKAR AND ANR
Mr. V. P. Latange, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Satyajit Boara, Advocate for the respondent No.1
CORAM : SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J. DATE : 24-09-2021
P. C.
. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
1 of 2
(2) criwp162.20
It is expected from the trial court to dispose of the original application within six months. Therefore, main application is required to be decided that would be convenient to both the parties. Hence, I pass the following order.
ORDER
ii. The Family Court, Jalna is directed to decide the application of respondent No.1 bearing No. E-144 of 2019 as early as possible, preferably within a period of four months from today.
[ SURENDRA P. TAVADE, J. ]
VishalK/criwp162.20
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the Family Court's interim maintenance order can be disposed of by directing the trial court to expedite the hearing.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PARAG S/O. MANOHAR JAMKHEDKAR
DIPTI W/O. PARAG JAMKHEDKAR
SURENDRA P. TAVADE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
