Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the learned advocate for the petitioner. Order is without cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3-WP-1613.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1613 OF 2021
Harishchandra A. Jadhav } Petitioner versus Union of India and Ors. } Respondents
Mr. Sangram Chinnappa i/b. Mr. Kartikeya Bahadur for the petitioner.
Mr. Rui Rodrigues with Mr. D. P. Singh for respondent no. 1.
CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE :- DECEMBER 2, 2021
PC :-
At the request of the learned advocate for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
SALUNKE J V
Digitally signed by SALUNKE J V Date: 2021.12.02 19:00:38 +0530
(M. S. KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Page 1 of 1
J.V.Salunke,PS
Harishchandra A. Jadhav
Union of India
Dipankar Datta
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
