This order grants leave to withdraw a criminal writ petition upon instructions from the petitioner and no objection from the respondent, ultimately dismissing the withdrawn petition.
Leave to withdraw the petition is granted and the writ petition is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
2_wp.1418.2019.doc
VISHWANATH SATYANARAYANA SHERLA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE
Digitally signed by VISHWANATH SATYANARAYANA SHERLA Date: 2021.09.13 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1418 OF 2019 15:46:57 +0530
Shri Abhishekh Shyamlal Chandak & others … Petitioners
State of Maharashtra & another … Respondents
Mr.Ashok Yadav i/b ABG Associates for the Petitioners
Mr.V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for Respondent – State Ms.Priyanka Makwana i/b Ms.M.M. Dave for Respondent No.2
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE &
N.J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 13, 2021
1. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners has circulated the praecipe for withdrawal of this petition. The learned Counsel submits that he has received instructions from the petitioner to withdraw the petition. Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 submits that she has no objection to the withdrawal of the petition.
Page 1 of 2
2_wp.1418.2019.doc
2. In view of the above, leave to withdraw the petition is granted. Writ Petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.
(N.J. JAMADAR, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)
Page 2 of 2
Vishwanath Satyanarayana Sherla
State of Maharashtra
Respondent No.2
S.S. SHINDE
N.J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
