An appeal was disposed of as withdrawn by the appellant, who sought permission to withdraw following the receipt of a DNA report in the Special Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sherla V.
3_apeal.218.2021.doc
Digitally signed by VISHWANATH VISHWANATH SATYANARAYANA SATYANARAYANA SHERLA SHERLA Date: 2021.09.09 19:07:59 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.218 OF 2021
Uddav @ Vinod Hanmant Chavan … Appellant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & another … Respondents
Mr.P.S. Kumbhar for the Appellant Mr.V.B. Konde-Deshmukh, APP, for Respondent – State
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE &
N.J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATED: SEPTEMBER 9, 2021
P.C.:
1. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant, on
instructions, submits that subsequent to rejection of application of the appellant filed before the Special Court, the said Court has received the DNA report. Therefore, in the changed circumstances, the appellant wishes to file an application before the Special Court and accordingly, on instructions, he seeks permission to withdraw this appeal.
2. Appeal is accordingly disposed off as withdrawn.
(N.J. JAMADAR, J.)
(S.S. SHINDE, J.)
Page 1 of 1
Uddav @ Vinod Hanmant Chavan
State of Maharashtra
S.S. SHINDE
N.J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
