Darshan Rajendra Patil v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought approval for his appointment pending with respondent no. 2. The A.G.P. accepted notice and the court directed respondent no. 2 to decide the proposal on merits within six months before disposing of the writ petition.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner to be appointed if proposal pending; respondent to decide within six months; petition disposed.