The High Court allowed amendments sought in two civil applications (1089 of 2021 and 750 of 2019) filed in WP/4444/2017 based on subsequently noticed facts and disposed of both proceedings.
Leave to amend the applications was allowed and the civil applications were disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 918-CA 1089-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1089 OF 2021
IN WP/4444/2017
Sachin Bajirao Aware and others
.. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Mr. Anand V. Patil (Indrale), Advocate for the Applicants.
Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondents-State.
Mr. D. G. Nagode, Advocate for Respondent No. 8.
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 750 OF 2019 IN WP/4444/2017
Sachin Bajirao Aware and others
.. Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Mr. Anand V. Patil (Indrale), Advocate for the Applicants.
Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondents-State.
Mr. D. G. Nagode, Advocate for Respondent No. 8.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED : 22nd JANUARY, 2021.
PER COURT:-
.The learned counsel for the applicants submits that some facts
came to the notice of the applicants subsequently, and as such, leave to
amend is sought.
1 of 2
2 918-CA 1089-2021.odt
2. We have heard the learned A.G.P. for the State.
3. For the reasons stated in the applications, applications are allowed for amendment.
4. Both civil applications are disposed of.
( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether applications for amendment should be allowed in the pending civil applications.
Sachin Bajirao Aware and others
The State of Maharashtra and others
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court