The High Court at Bombay disposed of a criminal writ petition challenging an exTernment order, noting the order had become infructuous. No active legal questions were addressed.
The Petition was disposed of on the ground that the Externment Order of 2016 has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
27-wp-1274-17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1274 OF 2017
Aakash Ganesh Swami @ Kalya Aakash ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
None for the Petitioner. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for Respondent/State.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 05 OCTOBER 2021
P.C. :
1. The learned APP points out that the Petition challenges the Externment Order of 2016 has become infructuous.
2. The Petition is disposed of as such.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Digitally signed byVINOD VINOD BHASKAR BHASKAR GOKHALE GOKHALE Date: 2021.10.05 17:30:28 +0530 Gokhale
1 of 1
Aakash Ganesh Swami @ Kalya Aakash
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court