Sachin Suryakant Patil Vs State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Anr.

The learned Counsel for the Respondents have drawn our attention to the prayers made by the Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 3143 of 2021 working as Civil Judge, Junior Division which is identical to the Writ Petition No.5494 of 2021 filed by the Maharashtra State Judges Association. In fact, the Association has

¶18

42.WP 5494.21.doc

¶19

2

¶20

filed a Petition after, as we are informed, the Court had expressed that the individual Judicial Officer may not have a locus.

¶21

In the light of the fact that the Maharashtra State Judges Association has now espousing the same cause, it is not necessary to keep the Writ Petition No. 3143 of 2021 filed by an individual Judicial Officer pending.

¶22

The Writ Petition No. 3143 of 2021 is accordingly disposed of.

¶23

Liberty to the Respondents to file their reply affidavits in Writ Petition No. 5494 of 2021. To enable them to do so, stand over to 18 October 2021.

¶24

SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.

¶25

Digitally signed JYOTI by JYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR PAWAR Date: 2021.10.06 10:07:12 +0530

Sachin Suryakant Patil v. State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin Suryakant Patil v. State of Maharashtra through Principal Secretary and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishnu Hanumant Phad Vs Police Inspector and Ors.

Sandesh Madhukar Bhogle Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dilshad Begum Mohamed Ibrahim Roghay and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.