Disposed

Shankar S/O Vithoba Pachare v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Chief Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC5 Mar 2021WP/1158/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged the delay in deciding a representation for pensionary benefits. The Court found the delay insufficient for a writ and directed the Secretary administratively.

What did the court decide?

Directed the Secretary to look into the grievance and issue necessary directions to the Chief Officer.

Shankar S/O Vithoba Pachare v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Chief Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Shankar S/O Vithoba Pachare v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Chief Secretary, Urban Development Dept., Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shailesh Pundlik Meshram Vs Union of India, Thr. Secreatary, to the Govt. of India,Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Revenue and Ot

Vishal Rameshrao Malode Vs Union of India, Thr. Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Revenue and Othe

Prashant Tukaram Dharkar Vs Union of India, Thr. Sec. Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance, Dept. of Revenue and Others

Ku. Ranjana D/O Tulshiramji Dharmale Vs the Yeoda Education Society, through Its Secretary, Amravati and Another

Pitruchaya Bahudeshiya Shikshan Sanstha, through Joint Secretary Rajendra M. Bhaisare Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Chief Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Vasan Wines, through Its Proprietor, Ashok S/O Lakharam Vanjani Vs State of Maharashtra, through Principal Secretary (State Excise), Mumbai