Petitioner argued that the Writ Petition is infructuous. Court disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0503wp3013.20.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 3013 OF 2020.
Vasan Wines.
…. Petitioner.
1.The State of Maharashtra,
and others.
…. Respondents.
Shri C.J. Dhruv, Advocate h/f. Shri S.P. Bodalkar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri A.A. Madiwale, Assistant Government Pleader for Respondents.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 5 MARCH 2021.
P.C.
The learned Counsel holding for the learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J) (NITIN JAMDAR, J)
Rgd Digitally signed Rakesh by Rakesh Dhuriya Date: 2021.03.06 Dhuriya 12:18:29 +0530
Vasan Wines
State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
