dated 3rd February 1989 executed by defendant No.3 for himself and for defendant Nos.2, 4 to 8 in favour of the original plaintiff. The respondent Nos.1A to 1C and 1E are the heirs and legal representatives of original plaintiff-Laxman Tukaram Vavle. They are impleaded as plaintiff Nos.1 to 5. By prayer clause 1 of the plaint, the plaintiff has sought direction to defendant Nos.2 to 8 to execute Sale Deed in favour of the plaintiff by accepting an amount of Rs.7,75,000/-. It is the contention of the original plaintiff in the application seeking amendment that on 14th November 2017, the plaintiff’s constituted attorney was cross-examined by the Advocate of defendant Nos.1 to 8 and from the said cross-examination it was realized by the plaintiffs and their Advocate that in the plaint prayer regarding possession was inadvertently not included. It is specifically mentioned in the application that prayers regarding execution of Sale Deed as sought in the plaint which also contemplates handing over possession by the owner to the plaintiff. Therefore, by the proposed amendment, only prayer that defendants be directed to hand over possession to the plaintiff was sought to be inserted by adding prayer clause 1(a).
