A Criminal Writ Petition filed under Article 226 seeking direction for FIR registration against respondents. The Bench held that Section 156(3) CrPC provides the statutory remedy for secrecy investigations and disposed of the Petition.
None; the Writ Petition is disposed of with directions to avail of the Section 156(3) CrPC remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
8.WP-1083-20.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1083 OF 2020
Shahaji Narayan Redekar …. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …. Respondents
Mr. Milind Ingole, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. K. V. Saste, APP, for Respondent No.1-State.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 05 OCTOBER 2021
P.C.
Digitally signed byPRADIPKUMAR PRADIPKUMARPRAKASHRAO PRAKASHRAODESHMANE DESHMANE Date: 2021.10.06 10:13:35 +0530
1 / 2
2
8.WP-1083-20.odt
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Deshmane (PS)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can seek writ relief for non-registration of FIR when Section 156(3) CrPC remedy is available.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shahaji Narayan Redekar
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court