Quashed

Anand Namdevrao Nagbhide v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC20 Jan 2021WP/1079/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench disposed of five writ petitions wherein petitioners challenged their placement on supernumerary posts without notice despite pending validation proceedings. The Court quashed the orders and directed the respondents to issue notice.

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders quashed and set aside; notice to issue and call upon petitioners to show cause; validation to be decided within six months.

Anand Namdevrao Nagbhide Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

(1)

¶2

930-937-946-962-963

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
930 WRIT PETITION NO.1046 OF 2021

¶4

RAJABHAU HARIBHAU GURLE ..PETITIONER

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS

¶7

Mr. G. K. Chinchole h/f. Mr. Ganesh B. Patunkar,
Advocate for the Petitioner.

¶8

Mr. S. R. Yadav Lonikar, AGP for Respondents-State.

¶9

… AND

¶10

BABURAO EKNATH KUNTHEWAD ..PETITIONER

¶11

VERSUS

¶12

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS

¶13

Mr. G. K. Chinchole, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents-State.

¶14

AND

¶15

946 WRIT PETITION NO.1062 OF 2021

¶16

JAMUNA BALWANTRAO KOLGANE ..PETITIONER

¶17

VERSUS

¶18

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS

¶19

Mr. G. K. Chinchole, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. R. Yadav Lonikar, AGP for Respondents-State.

¶20

…
AND

¶21

962 WRIT PETITION NO.1078 OF 2021

¶22

SHUBHANGI GANGADHARRAO PALLEWAD..PETITIONER

¶23

VERSUS

¶24

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS

¶25

(2) 930-937-946-962-963

¶26

Mr. G. K. Chinchole h/f. Mr. Ganesh B. Patunkar,
Advocate for the Petitioner.

¶27

Mrs. V. S. Choudhary, AGP for Respondents-State.

¶28

AND

¶29

963 WRIT PETITION NO.1079 OF 2021

¶30

ANAND NAMDEVRAO NAGBHIDE

¶31

..PETITIONER

¶32

VERSUS

¶33

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS

¶34

Mr. Sunil M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents-State.

¶35

 CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
 SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

¶36

 DATED : 20th JANUARY, 2021.

¶37

PER COURT:-

¶38

1.Issue notice to respondents. The learned
Assistant Government Pleader accept notice for all
respondents in respective writ petitions.

¶39

2.It is submitted that, validation
proceeding in respect of the tribe claims of the
petitioners are pending with the Scrutiny
Committee, the same are not decided. Without
issuing notice to the petitioners, the respondents
have placed the petitioners on the supernumerary
posts.

¶40

3.As the impugned orders are passed without
notice to the petitioners, we quash and set aside
the impugned orders.

¶41

(3)

¶42

930-937-946-962-963

¶43

4.In case the respondents want to take
action against the petitioners placing the
petitioners on supernumerary posts or otherwise,
then notice shall be issued to the petitioners,
calling upon them to show cause. In that event, the
petitioners can file reply and bring all the
relevant facts to the notice of the respondent –
Committee.

¶44

5.The Committee shall decide the validation
proceedings expeditiously and preferably within a
period of six months from the date of appearance of
the petitioners.

¶45

6.The petitioners shall appear before the
Committee on 28.01.2021.

¶46

7.In the light of the above, the writ
petitions are disposed of. No costs.

¶47

(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE

¶48

Devendra/January-2021

Anand Namdevrao Nagbhide v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Namdevrao Nagbhide v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kiran Murlidhar Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Others

Monika Laxman Chavan Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Others

Pankaj Namdeo Tupe Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Madhav Panditrao Parodwad Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Kailas Vishwanath Udate Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Kundlik Vishvanath Harishchandre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others