Suyog Gajanan Aundhkar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

1. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that his externment appeal is pending before Respondent No.2 – Divisional Commissioner (Revenue), Pune Region, Pune. He submits that the said appellate authority may be directed to decide the said appeal within a stipulated period.

¶12

2. In that view of the matter, we direct the appellate authority i.e., the Divisional Commissioner (Revenue), Pune Region, Pune, to decide the pending appeal, if not decided already, as

¶13

Page 1 of 2

¶14

45_wp.1069.2021.doc

¶15

expeditious as possible, however, within a period of two weeks from the receipt of the copy of this order, on its own merits, after adhering to the principles of natural justice. After taking such decision, the same shall be communicated to the petitioner.

¶16

3. With the above observations, the Writ Petition stands disposed off accordingly.

¶17

4. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order.

¶18

(MANISH PITALE, J.) (S.S. SHINDE, J.)

¶19

Page 2 of 2

Suyog Gajanan Aundhkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suyog Gajanan Aundhkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dayanand Meghshyam Dalvi and Ors. Vs the State of Maharahstra and Ors.

Faisal Javed Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Dhanesh Kumar Saini and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shahab Riyazul Hasan Sayed and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Shahab Riyazul Hasan Sayed and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Prabhakar @ Bablu Ashok Polkam Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.