The criminal revision application did not proceed as the applicant's counsel declined to press the plea after the trial had commenced and the first witness appeared in court. The application was disposed of as not pressed without hearing on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SHAGUFTA Q SHAGUFTA PATHAN Q PATHAN Date: 2021.08.10 17:49:29 +0530
9-revn-576-2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.576 OF 2016
Mehmoodali Sharafatali Sayyed ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Gaurav Bhawnani i/b Mr. Khan Abdul Wahab for the Applicant
Mr. S. S. Hulke, A.P.P for the Respondent–State
API Mr. Rajesh Patil from DCB, CID, Unit-4, Mumbai, is present
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. MONDAY, 9th AUGUST 2021
P.C. :
1 Since the trial has commenced and the first witness is in the witness-box, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, does not
press this application.
merits.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
1/1
Mehmoodali Sharafatali Sayyed
The State of Maharashtra
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
