An order disposing of multiple anticipatory bail applications. The High Court found the applications infructuous as the applicants had already been arrested and released on regular bail in the relevant cases.
All anticipatory bail applications and interim applications were disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by RUPALI RUPALI RAJESH RAJESH WAKODIKAR WAKODIKAR Date: 2021.08.09 12:39:13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1065 OF 2015
ALONGWITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2015
Uday Suresh Surve ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 727 OF 2015 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1065 OF 2015
Harsha Rohidas Kukar and Ors. ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 722 OF 2015 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2015
Alpesh Dhirendra Batavia (HUF) Karta and Anr. ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 644 OF 2015 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2015
Aditya Sehgal (Intervener) ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
1/4
Wakodikar
ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 650 OF 2015 IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2015
Lalitt B. Rohira (Intervenor) ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 795 OF 2015
IN IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2015
Dilip Kishanchand Dadlani ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 841 OF 2015
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2015
Sunil B. Sangvekar ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
ALONGWITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1066 OF 2015
Uday Suresh Surve ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 832 OF 2015
IN
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1066 OF 2015
Sanjay Kunjilal Agrawal ...Applicant
2/4
Wakodikar
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
ALONGWITH
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1226 OF 2015
Uday Suresh Surve ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 833 OF 2015 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1226 OF 2015
Vipul Suresh Mehta ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Chaitanya Kotnis i/b Kulkarni and Associates for the Applicant.
Ms. P.P.Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. DATE : 7th AUGUST, 2021
P.C. :
1. Learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, states that
the Applicant was arrested in all the C.Rs. i.e. C.R.Nos. 442 of 2015, 634 of 2015 and 403 of 2015, initially registered with the D.N.Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, and C.R.No.369 of 2015 registered with the MHB Police
3/4
Wakodikar
Station, Borivali (W) and subsequently, transferred to the E.O.W., Mumbai. He submits that after the Applicant was arrested in the said C.Rs., he was released on regular bail and that, chargesheet has been filed in all the aforesaid C.Rs.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
4/4
Wakodikar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail applications survive for consideration after the applicants have already been arrested and released on regular bail.
Uday Suresh Surve
The State of Maharashtra
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
