The High Court dismissed the Public Interest Litigation for failure of the petitioner to deposit the directed amount despite repeated opportunities and extensions granted.
Public Interest Litigation No.23 of 2016 stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
975
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
975 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.23 OF 2016
ANURATH TATYARAO CHANDMARE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr Jadhav Hanumant P. AGP for Respondents State: Mr P K Lakhotiya
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 5th March, 2021.
ORDER :
be annexed thereto.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Page 1 of 1
ANURATH TATYARAO CHANDMARE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
