The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed a Public Interest Litigation as the petitioner failed to deposit the required amount within the directed timeframe despite multiple extensions granted up to February 12, 2021.
The Public Interest Litigation stands dismissed for failure to deposit the directed amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
979
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
979 PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.106 OF 2017
SUBHASH KATHALU BAPMARE VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Choudhary D. J. AGP for Respondents State: Mr P K Lakhotiya
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 5th March, 2021.
ORDER :
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Page 1 of 1
Subhash Kathalu Bapmare
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
