The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of Arbitration Application No. 6 of 2020, which the applicant sought to withdraw. The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the application.
Application dismissed as withdrawn upon acceptance of withdrawal by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
917 Arbappln-6.2020.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
917 ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.6 OF 2020
M/S ARCHITECTURE CONCERN THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR RAHULRAMKRISHNA MAKODE VERSUS THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL,OMERGA THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER
Mr. A.K. Gawali, Advocate for the applicant.
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 27-07-2021.
ORDER :
instructions, seeks to withdraw the application.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
VD_Dhirde
M/S ARCHITECTURE CONCERN THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR RAHULRAMKRISHNA MAKODE
THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, OMERGA THROUGH ITS CHIEF OFFICER
AVINASH G. GHAROTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
