The High Court of Judicature at Bombay restored the applicant's dismissed anticipatory bail application to her file for a fresh circulation and disposal on merits due to a lack of prosecution in the earlier hearing.
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 964 of 2020 restored to file; applicant at liberty to take fresh circulation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44-IA-353-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 353 OF 2021 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 964 OF 2020
Smita @ Deepali Amit Jadhav .... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
Mr. Gopal S. Singh i/b Hulyalkar and Associates for the applicant.
Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for the State/Respondent.
CORAM:SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE :17th FEBRUARY 2021
P.C. :
No. 964 of 2020 was dismissed on 25/1/2020, for non prosecution as no one appeared for her.
same. In the interest of justice,the anticipatory bail application can be restored so that it can be decided on merits.
y.s.patil
1 of 2
44-IA-353-2021.odt
ORDER
(i) Anticipatory Bail Application No. 964 of
(ii) The applicant is at liberty to take fresh
circulation of ABA No. 964 of 2020.
(iii) The Interim Application is disposed of accordingly.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
y.s.patil
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the dismissed anticipatory bail application should be restored for hearing on merits.
Smita @ Deepali Amit Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
