Disposed
Rajendra Vasant Dhaigude v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCBA/64/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
BA 64-2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
34 BA 64-2021.odt
1 / 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 64 OF 2021
Rajendra Vasant Dhaigude.... Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
Mr. Prashant S. Hagare, Advocate for Applicant.
Smt. J. S. Lohokare, APP for State/Respondent.
CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 17th FEBRUARY, 2021
P.C. :
. Learned counsel for the applicant states that during the
pendency of this application, charge-sheet is filed and therefore,
the applicant wishes to approach the trial Court for the same relief,
in the changed circumstances and therefore, prays for withdrawal
of this application.
2. The application is allowed to be withdrawn with
liberty to approach the trial Court for the same relief in changed
circumstances of filing of the chargesheet. The application is
disposed of accordingly.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Manjusha
Rajendra Vasant Dhaigude
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court