The applicant sought leave to withdraw an interim application following their daughter’s discharge and her return to India. The court disposed of the application as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the application was granted and the application was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2890 OF 2021 IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 265 OF 2021
Saket Kamleshkumar Agarwal V/s.
… Applicant
The Director, Serious Fraud Investigation Office and Ors. ... Respondents
Mr. Jonathan Jose i/b. Argus Partners for the Applicant Ms. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent – State Mr. Pradeep Yadav for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 1 DECEMBER 2021
P.C. :-
The learned Counsel for the Applicant states that in view of subsequent development that the Applicant’s daughter has now been discharged and would be coming to India, seeks leave to withdraw the Application.
SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. NITIN JAMDAR, J.
JYOTI Digitally signed byJYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR Date: 2021.12.03 PAWAR 10:35:56 +0530
Saket Kamleshkumar Agarwal
The Director, Serious Fraud Investigation Office
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
