The High Court allowed an appellant to withdraw Criminal Appeal No. 1506 of 2019 in terms of withdrawal instructions. The trial was noted as having commenced.
The Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn;
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1506 OF 2019
Kiran Sugriv Borkar … Appellant V/s.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Milind Parab i/b. Milind Parab & Associates for the Appellant Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent - State
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 1 DECEMBER 2021
P.C. :-
After arguing for some time, the learned Counsel for the Appellant states that he has received instructions to withdraw the Appeal and prays that the trial may be expedited. It is informed that the trial has already commenced. Once the trial has commenced, we have no doubt that the Additional Sessions Judge would complete the trial as per the time schedule.
withdrawn.
SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
NITIN JAMDAR, J.
JYOTI Digitally signed byJYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR Date: 2021.12.03 PAWAR 10:36:16 +0530
Kiran Sugriv Borkar
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
