The High Court disposed of an interim application as it became infructuous due to an order passed by the Commissioner. No substantive judgment was rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
SMITA Digitally signed bySMITA JOHNSON JOHNSONGONSALVES GONSALVESDate: 2021.10.1411:21:13 +0530
20.ia2487-21.doc
1/1
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2487 OF 2021 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2454 OF 2021
Sabina Yusuf Lakdawala .. Applicant v/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Mathew Nedumpara, a/w. Ms. Maria Nedumpara, i/b. Rohini Amin, for the Applicant.
Mr. Asadali Mazgaonwala, a/w. Mr. Kartikeya Desai, i/b. Kartikeya & Associates, for Respondent Nos. 5 to 10.
Ms. S.D. Shinde, APP, for Respondent State.
Mr. Ajay Chandanshiv, PSI, Bandra Police Station is present.
CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL JJ.
DAT20E : 12 OCTOBER 2021.
P.C:-
Learned Counsel for the Applicant states that this application has become infructuous, as subsequently an order is passed by learned Commissioner on 11 October 2021. The interim application is, accordingly, disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
1 of 1
Sabina Yusuf Lakdawala
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
