Dismissed

Ramdas Gulab Modak v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC1 Sept 2021IA/1302/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the applicant sought release pending trial. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the trial was underway with 26 witnesses examined and more proposed. Relying on such submissions, the Court rejected the bail application and disposed of the interim application as well.

What did the court decide?

Bail application rejected and disposed of; interim application disposed of.

Ramdas Gulab Modak Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1 of 2 32.BA.3349.2019.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

BAIL APPLICATION NO.3349 OF 2019

¶4

Ganesh Baban GaikwadApplicant
versus
The State of MaharashtraRespondent

¶5

WITH

¶6

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1302 OF 2020

¶7

Ramdas gulab ModakIntervenor
In the matter between:
Ganesh Baban GaikwadApplicant
versus
The State of MaharashtraRespondent

¶8

Mr.Mandar M. Goswami, Adv. For applicant in Bail Application.
Mr.Satyavrat Joshi, Adv. For intervenor.
Mr.Y.Y.Dabake, APP, for State.

¶9

CORAM :PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE :1st September 2021

¶10

PC :

¶11

1.Learned APP, on instructions from Special Public Prosecutor
appearing before Trial Court, submitted that trial has proceeded. So
far the prosecution has examined about 26 witnesses and the
prosecution proposes to examine further six witnesses. Vide order
dated 2nd February 2021 this Court had observed that learned APP
has placed on record communication dated 1st February 2020
indicating that on day to day basis the subject trial is going on. The
said report was taken on record. It was also observed that prima
facie it will not be proper to consider application for bail.

¶12

MANISH Digitally signed byMANISH SURESH SURESHTHATTE THATTEDate: 2021.09.0211:18:05 +0530

¶13

2 of 2 32.BA.3349.2019.doc

¶14

2.In view of the submission of learned APP, bail cannot be
granted to the applicant. Hence, I pass following order :

¶15

ORDER

¶16

(i) Bail Application is rejected and disposed of;

¶17

(ii)It is expected that trial would continue on day to day basis and
conclude as early as possible;

¶18

(iii)Interim Application No.1302 of 2020 is disposed of.

¶19

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)

¶20

MST

Ramdas Gulab Modak v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramdas Gulab Modak v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajan Ayyar Shettiyar . Vs the State of Maharashtra .

Hoor C. Jhurani Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Sayaji L. Sangle Vs the Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr.

Dhanashri Nandkumar Mandale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Arbaz Ziauddin Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Yasin Shakir Khan Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.