Allowed

Shri. Mahadu Rakhmaji Undre and Ors. v. Green Fields Partnership Firm Pune Thr. Partners Shriniwas G. Desai(Thr.Lrs) India S. Desai

Bombay HC29 Oct 2021IA/1257/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed an interim application seeking the impleadment of Respondent Nos.10 and 11 as necessary parties in a Second Appeal, where they had acquired suit property pending the appeal.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed to implead Respondent Nos.10 and 11; amendment to be carried out within three weeks.

What the court decided

Shri. Mahadu Rakhmaji Undre and Ors. Vs Green… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

Tandale

¶2

 21-IA-1257-2021 in Sa-275-2020.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1257 OF 2021 IN

¶6

SECOND APPEAL NO. 275 OF 2020

¶7

Shri. Mahadu Rakhmaji Undre and Ors.… Applicants.

¶8

In the matter between :-

¶9

Shri. Mahadu Rakhmaji Undre and Ors.… Appellants.
V/s.
Green Fields Partnership Firm Pune
Through Partners Shriniwas G. Desai
(Since deceased through Lrs.)
a) Indira Shriniwas Desai and Ors.… Respondents.

¶10

Mr. Balasaheb G. Ligade, Advocate for Applicants.
Mr. S. S. Aradhye, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1B, 2 to 5.
Mr. Y. Y. Dabke, A.G.P. for Respondent No.10-State.

¶11

CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J.
DATE : 29th October, 2021.

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

1. This is an Application for impleading Respondent Nos.10 and 11

¶14

as a necessary party in the present Appeal.

¶15

2. Learned counsel appearing for the Applicants/Appellants

¶16

submitted that, during the pendency of the present Appeal, the proposed

¶17

Respondent Nos.10 and 11 are in process of acquisition of suit property and

¶18

releasing the compensation in favour of Respondent Nos.1 to 9 and therefore

¶19

1/2

¶20

Tandale 21-IA-1257-2021 in Sa-275-2020.odt

¶21

proposed Respondent Nos.10 and 11 are necessary party to the present
Appeal.

¶22

3. Learned counsel for the respective parties have no serious objection in allowing the present Application.

¶23

4. In view thereof and for the reasons stated in the Application, Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).

¶24

Necessary amendment in Second Appeal and pending Application
if any, be carried out within a period of three weeks from today.

¶25

5. As far as prayer Clauses (c) and (d) are concerned, the Applicant/

¶26

Appellants are granted liberty to file a separate Application in that behalf.

¶27

6. Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.

¶28

[A.S. GADKARI, J.]

¶29

Digitally signed by MANOJ R MANOJ R TANDALE TANDALE Date: 2021.11.01 17:48:10 +0530

¶30

2/2

Shri. Mahadu Rakhmaji Undre and Ors. v. Green Fields Partnership Firm Pune Thr. Partners Shriniwas G. Desai(Thr.Lrs) India S. Desai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Shri. Mahadu Rakhmaji Undre and Ors. v. Green Fields Partnership Firm Pune Thr. Partners Shriniwas G. Desai(Thr.Lrs) India S. Desai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Vijaya Kasat Fernandes Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Om Shree Geetanjali Nagar a and B Co-Operative Housing Society Limited Vs Shree Jalaram Sanskruti Nirman , Partnership Firm

Mrs. Shivubai Mahadeo Khatake and Ors. Vs Narayan Tukaram Sarvade and Ors.

Rajivi Chandrahas Shettigar Vs Lalitkumar Kesarimal Jain

Shri. Mahadu Rakhmaji Undre and Ors. Vs Green Lands Partnership Firm Thr. Partnership Anant G. Desai(Thr.Lrs) Shobha S. Hejmadi and Ors.

Ravi Bhagwan Gaikar and Ors. Vs Eknath Ziprya Patil(Dead by Heirs ) Motibai Eknath Patil and Ors.