Single judge order disposing of a writ petition seeking quashing of a notice and impugned order under the Rent Control Act. The court held that a prior interim order deprived the present petition of survivability, resulting in disposal.
Petition dismissed as it no longer survives due to a prior interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sajakali Jamadar
1- Wp-3091-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3091 OF 2021
Vijaya Kasat Fernandes… Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.… Respondents
Mr. N. P. Bhavsar, for Petitioner.
Mr. Siddhesh Kalel, AGP for Respondent – State.
CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J.
DATE : 28th October, 2021.
P.C. :
In view of Order passed in Interim Application No.2429 of 2021
in Writ Petition Nos.1232 of 2016, the present petition seeking quashing of
notice issued and impugned Order dated 4th March, 2021, passed by the
Competent Authority Rent Control Act, Konkan Division, Mumbai does not
survive and is accordingly disposed off.
[A.S. GADKARI, J.]
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR JAMADAR Date: 2021.11.10 14:59:04 +0530
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of the notice and impugned order no longer survives after an interim order in a prior writ petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vijaya Kasat Fernandes
The State of Maharashtra
A.S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court