Single judge disposed of an interim application seeking condonation of delay in preferring a criminal appeal against a conviction judgment, allowing the delay.
Interim Application No.1008 of 2020 stood disposed of accordingly with the delay in filing appeal condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14-Ia-1008-2020-in-Apeal(St)-338-2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1008 OF 2020
IN
CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST.) NO.338 OF 2020
Ajaykumar Indrajeet Singh
… Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Ashish Satpute, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. S. R. Agarkar, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE: 16th SEPTEMBER, 2021
PER COURT:
.This is an application for condonation of delay in
preferring appeal challenging the Judgment of conviction. In the
interest of justice the delay is condoned. Interim Application
No.1008 of 2020 stands disposed of accordingly.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
Digitally signed by SAJAKALI SAJAKALI LIYAKAT LIYAKAT JAMADAR JAMADAR Date:2021.09.18 11:50:54 +0530
1 of 1
Sajakali Jamadar
Ajaykumar Indrajeet Singh
The State of Maharashtra
PRAKASH D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court