The single family court appeal was disposed of on the appellant's motion to withdraw after proof was recorded that the underlying marriage had been dissolved by consent by the Family Court, Nanded.
The appeal was disposed of in terms of the order annexed by the appellant recording the dissolution of the marriage by consent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5-FCA.56-19.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
5 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.56 OF 2019
KIRTI SHAILESH KADAM
VERSUS
SHAILESH MURALIDHARRAO KADAM
Advocate for Appellant : Ms. A.S. Jadhav h/f
Mr. Katneshwarkar P. R.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, AND
S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 27.09.2021
PER COURT:-
1. The appellant/petitioner had moved a circulation motion
dated 22.09.2021 stating therein that the appellant desires to
withdraw the appeal, as the marriage has been dissolved.
Today, the learned advocate for the appellant places on record
a compilation of four pages, which is a copy of the order dated
26.10.2020 passed by the learned Family Court, Nanded
concluding that the marriage between the parties has been
dissolved by consent. The said order is marked as ‘X’ for
identification.
5-FCA.56-19.odt
2
2. In view of the above, this appeal is disposed off in terms
of the order Annexure 'X'.
(S. G. MEHARE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
vmk/-
Kirti Shailesh Kadam
Shailesh Muralidharrao Kadam
Ravindra V. Ghuge
S. G. Mehare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court