Appeal heard in absence of respondent-appellant urged second marriage by respondent during pendency. Civil application disposed off; appeal listed for final hearing on 21.10.2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17-FCA.12-18.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
17 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.12 OF 2018
WITH CA/1762/2018 IN FCA/12/2018
PRATIBHA VISHNU BHALERAO
VERSUS
VISHNU TUKARAM BHALERAO
Adv. for Appellant : Mr. M. B. Sandanshiv h/f Mr. Pagare S. N.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, AND
S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 27.09.2021
PER COURT:-
1. None present for the respondent.
2. The learned advocate for the appellant submits that the
appeal paper book has been filed and the petition can be heard
finally.
3. Considering the urgency shown by the appellant, in view
of the statement that the respondent has performed a second
marriage during the pendency of this proceeding, list this
appeal on 21.10.2021 for final hearing.
4. In view of the above, the pending Civil Application
17-FCA.12-18.odt
2
No.1762 of 2018 would not survive and stands disposed off.
(S. G. MEHARE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
vmk/-
PRATIBHA VISHNU BHALERAO
VISHNU TUKARAM BHALERAO
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
S. G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court