Disposed

Pandurang Rambhau Zol v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Bombay HC25 Sept 2021FA/3131/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment is an order from the Maharashtra National Lok Adalat disposing of numerous land acquisition appeals. The court recorded an amicable settlement between the claimants and the acquiring body. The acquiring body was directed to deposit the settlement amount within eight months, with interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 becoming payable in case of default.

What did the court decide?

Directing the acquiring body to deposit the settlement amount within eight months; entitlement to interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in case of default; award of court fees re

Pandurang Rambhau Zol Vs the State of Mah and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1 503.17FA+.odt

¶2

IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.
HELD ON 25Th SEPTEMBER, 2021

¶3

AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE
AT AURANGABAD

¶4

901 FIRST APPEAL NO.503 OF 2007
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.517 OF 2007
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.516 OF 2007
WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.511 OF 2007

¶5

RANGNATH JAIVANTA ZOLE

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶8

AND

¶9

902 FIRST APPEAL NO.507 OF 2007

¶10

AND

¶11

903 FIRST APPEAL NO.509 OF 2007

¶12

AND
904 FIRST APPEAL NO.510 OF 2007

¶13

AND

¶14

905 FIRST APPEAL NO.512 OF 2007
AND

¶15

906 FIRST APPEAL NO.513 OF 2007

¶16

AND

¶17

907 FIRST APPEAL NO.515 OF 2007

¶18

AND

¶19

908 FIRST APPEAL NO.533 OF 2007 WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.534 OF 2007

¶20

AND

¶21

909 FIRST APPEAL NO.544 OF 2007

¶22

AND

¶23

910 FIRST APPEAL NO.570 OF 2007

¶24

AND

¶25

911 FIRST APPEAL NO.1814 OF 2008

¶26

AND

¶27

912 FIRST APPEAL NO.1816 OF 2008

¶28

AND

¶29

913 FIRST APPEAL NO.1835 OF 2008

¶30

AND

¶31

2 503.17FA+.odt

¶32

914 FIRT APPEAL NO.1836 OF 2008

¶33

AND

¶34

915 FIRST APPEAL NO.1837 OF 2008

¶35

AND

¶36

916 FIRST APPEAL NO.1838 OF 2008
AND

¶37

917 FIRST APPEAL NO.2457 OF 2008
AND

¶38

918 FIRST APPEAL NO.3529 OF 2008
AND

¶39

919 FIRST APPEAL NO.359 OF 2009
AND

¶40

920 FIRST APPEAL NO.364 OF 2009
AND

¶41

921 FIRST APPEAL NO.570 OF 2009
AND

¶42

922 FIRST APPEAL NO.800 OF 2009
AND

¶43

923 FIRST APPEAL NO.2634 OF 2009
AND

¶44

924 FIRST APPEAL NO.3130 OF 2009
AND

¶45

925 FIRST APPEAL NO.3131 OF 2009

¶46

AND

¶47

926 FIRST APPEAL NO.3132 OF 2009

¶48

AND

¶49

927 FIRST APPEAL NO.3239 OF 2009
AND

¶50

928 FIRST APPEAL NO.1886 OF 2010

¶51

AND

¶52

929 FIRST APPEAL NO.2019 OF 2010

¶53

AND

¶54

930 FIRST APPEAL NO.2490 OF 2011

¶55

3 503.17FA+.odt

¶56

AND

¶57

931 FIRST APPEAL NO.139 OF 2013

¶58

AND

¶59

932 FIRST APPEAL NO.212 OF 2013

¶60

AND

¶61

933 FIRST APPEAL NO.831 OF 2013

¶62

AND

¶63

934 FIRST APPEAL NO.832 OF 2013

¶64

AND

¶65

935 FIRST APPEAL NO.833 OF 2013

¶66

AND

¶67

936 FIRST APPEAL NO.834 OF 2013

¶68

AND

¶69

937 FIRST APPEAL NO.1569 OF 2013

¶70

AND

¶71

938 FIRST APPEAL NO.2347 OF 2013

¶72

AND

¶73

939 FIRST APPEAL NO.2365 OF 2013

¶74

AND

¶75

940 FIRST APPEAL NO.2366 OF 2013
AND

¶76

941 FIRST APPEAL NO.2673 OF 2013

¶77

AND

¶78

942 FIRST APPEAL NO.2899 OF 2013

¶79

AND

¶80

943 FIRST APPEAL NO.3147 OF 2013

¶81

AND

¶82

944 FIRST APPEAL NO.515 OF 2015

¶83

WITH FIRST APPEAL NO.1073 OF 2013

¶84

AND

¶85

945 FIRST APPEAL NO.516 OF 2015

¶86

AND

¶87

946 FIRST APPEAL NO.1790 OF 2015

¶88

4 503.17FA+.odt

¶89

AND

¶90

948 FIRST APPEAL NO.2296 OF 2016

¶91

AND

¶92

949 FIRST APPEAL NO.2976 OF 2019

¶93

AND

¶94

950 FIRST APPEAL NO.1368 OF 2020

¶95

AND

¶96

951 FIRST APPEAL NO.767 OF 2021

¶97

AND

¶98

952 FIRST APPEAL NO.1787 OF 2021

¶99

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18525 OF 2021]

¶100

AND

¶101

953 FIRST APPEAL NO.1788 OF 2021

¶102

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18530 OF 2021]

¶103

AND

¶104

954 FIRST APPEAL NO.1789 OF 2021

¶105

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18527 OF 2021]

¶106

AND

¶107

955 FIRST APPEAL NO.1808 OF 2021

¶108

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18438 OF 2021]

¶109

WITH

¶110

FIRST APPEAL NO.1809 OF 2021

¶111

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18441 OF 2021]

¶112

AND

¶113

956 FIRST APPEAL NO.1818 OF 2021

¶114

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18558 OF 2021]

¶115

WITH

¶116

 FIRST APPEAL NO.1819 OF 2021

¶117

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18563 OF 2021]

¶118

WITH

¶119

 FIRST APPEAL NO.1820 OF 2021

¶120

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.18561 OF 2021]

¶121

5 503.17FA+.odt

¶122

AND

¶123

957 FIRST APPEAL NO.1843 OF 2021

¶124

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.23949 OF 2016]

¶125

AND

¶126

958 FIRST APPEAL NO.1844 OF 2021

¶127

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.34545 OF 2018]

¶128

AND

¶129

959 FIRST APPEAL NO.1845 OF 2021

¶130

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.36822 OF 2015]

¶131

AND

¶132

960 FIRST APPEAL NO.2025 OF 2021

¶133

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.23642 OF 2016]

¶134

AND

¶135

987 FIRST APPEAL NO.74 OF 2012

¶136

AND

¶137

988 FIRST APPEAL NO.75 OF 2012

¶138

AND

¶139

1001 FIRST APPEAL NO.2033 OF 2014

¶140

AND

¶141

1004 FIRST APPEAL NO.1899 OF 2021

¶142

[FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.10868 OF 2021]

¶143

O R D E R

¶144

1]Mr.D.M.Kakade, learned Advocate for the claimants –
appellants, Mr.P.B.Jadhav, Executive Engineer, Jalna Irrigation Division,
Jalna, Mr.Ruturaj Patil along with Mr.B.R.Surwase, learned counsel
holding for all the Advocates appearing in various matters on behalf of
GMIDC and Mrs. Suchita Dhongade, advocate holding for
Mr.S.D.Dhongade, Advocate for the respondent-Acquiring body and
Mr.B.V.Virdhe, AGP for the State, are present.

¶145

6 503.17FA+.odt

¶146

2]These matters are placed before the Panel of Today’s
National Lok Adalat in view of settlement arrived between the parties.

¶147

3]Learned counsel appearing for the respective sides and
concerned parties submit that they have settled their disputes amicably
and they have placed on record terms of compromise. They further
submit that the matters have been fully and finally settled between the
parties. The compromise pursis / terms of compromise are taken on
record and marked as ‘X’ for identification.

¶148

4]They submit that in view of the terms of settlement between
the parties described in the compromise pursis, these appeals may be
disposed of.

¶149

5]In view of amicable settlement arrived between the parties
and in terms of compromise, these appeals stand disposed of. It is a full
and final settlement arrived between the parties.

¶150

6]The acquiring body shall deposit the settlement amount as
agreed within 8 months from today in this Court. In case of failure on
the part of the acquiring body, the appellants – claimants are entitled to
get statutory benefits i.e. interest under Section 28 of the Land
Acquisition Act, 1894.

¶151

7]The appellants – claimants are entitled to withdraw the
amount of settlement deposited by the acquiring body.

¶152

8]The Court fees refund certificate be issued as per the Rules
in favour of the appellants - claimants. Registry to take necessary steps
to that effect.

¶153

7 503.17FA+.odt

¶154

9] The award/decree be drawn up in terms of compromise.

¶155

10] Civil Applications, if any, also disposed of.

¶156

11] No order as to the costs.

¶157

( K. C. Sant ) ( V. B. Mantri ) (SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J. )
 Advocate District Judge (Retd.) Head of the Panel
 Member Member

¶158

Date : 25.09.2021.
Place : Aurangabad.

¶159

DDC

Pandurang Rambhau Zol v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pandurang Rambhau Zol v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Mah. Vs Narayan Khandu Sirsath and Ors.

The State of Mah and Ors. Vs Dnyanoba Eknath Chauhan

State of Maharashtra Vs Babu Mahada Chaware

Asaram Gangadhar Akat Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Niverti Mahadeorao Late Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Atmaram Yeshvantrao Manwatkar Vs the State of Mah and Ors.