Allowed

Atmaram Yeshvantrao Manwatkar v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Bombay HC25 Sept 2021FA/2422/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A National Lok Adalat upheld an amicable settlement between the State of Maharashtra and multiple appellants/claimants regarding land acquisition compensation. The court disposed of numerous pending First Appeals, directed the government body to deposit the agreed settlement amount, and denied statutory interest for the condoned delay period.

What did the court decide?

Settlement amount to be deposited by acquiring body; court fee refund certificate to be issued; statutory interest denied.

Atmaram Yeshvantrao Manwatkar Vs the State of Mah and Ors. — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1 985 (+20).odt

¶2

IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY
HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.
HELD ON 25Th SEPTEMBER, 2021

¶3

AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE AT AURANGABAD

¶4

 985 FIRST APPEAL NO.223 OF 2013

¶5

DINKAR DAJIBA LATE

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶8

AND

¶9

986 FIRST APPEAL NO.4301 OF 2017

¶10

AND

¶11

989 FIRST APPEAL NO. 76 OF 2012

¶12

AND

¶13

990 FIRST APPEAL NO.2403 OF 2012

¶14

AND

¶15

 991 FIRST APPEAL NO.2417 OF 2012

¶16

AND

¶17

992 FIRST APPEAL NO.2418 OF 2012

¶18

AND

¶19

993 FIRST APPEAL NO.2419 OF 2012

¶20

AND

¶21

994 FIRST APPEAL NO.2420 OF 2012

¶22

AND

¶23

995 FIRST APPEAL NO.2421 OF 2012

¶24

AND

¶25

996 FIRST APPEAL NO.2422 OF 2012

¶26

AND

¶27

997 FIRST APPEAL NO.2423 OF 2012

¶28

AND

¶29

998 FIRST APPEAL NO.2425 OF 2012

¶30

AND

¶31

2 985 (+20).odt

¶32

999 FIRST APPEAL NO.2426 OF 2012

¶33

AND

¶34

1000 FIRST APPEAL NO. 333 OF 2013

¶35

AND
 1006 FIRST APPEAL NO. 49 OF 2013

¶36

AND

¶37

1007 FIRST APPEAL NO. 222 OF 2013

¶38

AND

¶39

1008 FIRST APPEAL NO. 334 OF 2013

¶40

AND

¶41

1009 FIRST APPEAL NO. 335 OF 2013

¶42

AND

¶43

 1079 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2424 OF 2012

¶44

AND

¶45

1080 FIRST APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2013

¶46

AND

¶47

1081 FIRST APPEAL NO. 332 OF 2013

¶48

O R D E R

¶49

1.Mr. P.R. Kadam, learned counsel for the appellants/claimants, Mr.
B.R. Survase, learned counsel for acquiring body, Mr. B.V. Virdhe, learned
AGP for the respondent/State and Mr. P.B. Jadhav, Executive Engineer,
Jalna Irrigation Division, Jalna are present.

¶50

2. These First Appeals are placed before this panel of today’s National Lok Adalat in view of settlement between the parties.

¶51

3 985 (+20).odt

¶52

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respective sides and concerned
parties submit that they have settled their dispute amicably and they have
placed on record terms of compromise. They further submitted that the
matters have been fully and finally settled between the parties. The
compromise pursis / terms of compromise are taken on record and
marked as ‘X’ for identification.

¶53

4.They submitted that in view of amicable settlement between the
parties described in the compromise pursis, these appeals may be disposed
of.

¶54

5. In view of amicable settlement between the parties and in terms of compromise arrived between the parties, these appeals stand disposed of. It is a full and final settlement arrived between the parties.

¶55

6.The acquiring body shall deposit the settlement amount as agreed
within eight (08) months from today in this Court.

¶56

7.The appellants/claimants are entitled to withdraw the amount of
settlement deposited by the acquiring body.

¶57

8.The appellants/claimants are not entitled for statutory benefits i.e.
interest under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the
delayed period in filing the First Appeals, which is condoned by this Court.

¶58

9.The award/decree be drawn up in terms of compromise.

¶59

4 985 (+20).odt

¶60

10. The Court fee refund certificate be issued as per the rules in favour

¶61

of the appellants/claimants. Registry to take necessary steps to that effect.

¶62

11. The Civil Application/s pending if any, also stand/s disposed of.

¶63

12. No order as to the costs.

¶64

( K. C. Sant ) ( V. B. Mantri ) (SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J. )
 Advocate District Judge (Retd.)Head of the Panel
 Member Member

¶65

Date : 25.09.2021.
Place : Aurangabad.

¶66

S P Rane

Atmaram Yeshvantrao Manwatkar v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Atmaram Yeshvantrao Manwatkar v. the State of Mah and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Mah. Vs Narayan Khandu Sirsath and Ors.

The State of Mah and Ors. Vs Dnyanoba Eknath Chauhan

State of Maharashtra Vs Babu Mahada Chaware

Asaram Gangadhar Akat Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Niverti Mahadeorao Late Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Pandurang Rambhau Zol Vs the State of Mah and Ors.