Disposed

The State of Maharashtra v. Sayyad Bibban Sayyad Chand and Ors.

Bombay HC25 Sept 2021FA/1934/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This National Lok Adalat disposed of 26 First Appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against Original Awards. The appeals were withdrawn by the appellant-State pursuant to a Government Resolution. The Lok Adalat ordered the State to deposit the awarded amounts within one year.

What did the court decide?

State granted one year to deposit awarded amounts in Court or before Reference Court with interest; Appeals disposed of as withdrawn.

The State of Maharashtra Vs Sayyad Bibban Sayyad Chand and Ors. — Bombay HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

1 Beed.odt

¶2

IN THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT PRESIDED OVER BY HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. G. AVACHAT, J. HELD ON 25^th SEPTEMBER, 2021

¶3

AT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES SUB-COMMITTEE AT AURANGABAD

¶4

1 FIRST APPEAL NO.1894 OF 2009

¶5

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

NENA NARHARI PARBALE

¶8

2 FIRST APPEAL NO.1899 OF 2009 WITH FA/1900/2009

¶9

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶10

VERSUS

¶11

ASHUBA SHRIPATI PECHE

¶12

3 FIRST APPEAL NO.2226 OF 2009 WITH FA/2229/2009 WITH FA/2230/2009

¶13

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶14

VERSUS

¶15

DASHRATH ASRUBA MOHITE AND ANOTHER

¶16

4 FIRST APPEAL NO.2434 OF 2009

¶17

WITH FA/2547/2009 WITH X-OBJ(ST)/5735/201 IN FA/2547/2009

¶18

WITH X-OBJ(ST)/5736/201 IN FA/2545/2009

¶19

WITH X-OBJ(ST)/5737/201 IN FA/2546/2009 WITH FA/2546/2009 WITH FA/2543/2009 WITH FA/2545/2009

¶20

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

¶21

VERSUS UDHAV DINKARRAO SANAP AND OTHERS

¶22

5 FIRST APPEAL NO.2620 OF 2009 WITH FA/2618/2009 WITH FA/2619/2009

¶23

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS

¶24

MAHADEO CHHANDAR DHOLE AND ANOTHER

¶25

6 FIRST APPEAL NO.2652 OF 2009

¶26

WITH FA/2653/2009 WITH FA/2654/2009 WITH FA/2656/2009 WITH FA/2655/2009

¶27

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶28

VERSUS

¶29

SHIVAJI SHANKARRAO GUTTE

¶30

2 Beed.odt

¶31

7 FIRST APPEAL NO.2664 OF 2009 WITH FA/2665/2009

¶32

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶33

VERSUS

¶34

PATLOBA BHAGOJI DAHIFALE AND OTHERS

¶35

8 FIRST APPEAL NO.2666 OF 2009 WITH FA/2667/2009

¶36

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶37

VERSUS

¶38

ANJANOTHERAO BHAGOJIRAO SHEP

¶39

9 FIRST APPEAL NO.3018 OF 2009

¶40

WITH FA/3019/2009 WITH FA/3020/2009 WITH FA/3021/2009

¶41

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR VERSUS

¶42

BHAGWAN BAMAJI PHAD

¶43

10 FIRST APPEAL NO.3085 OF 2009

¶44

WITH FA/3084/2009 WITH FA/3086/2009 WITH FA/3087/2009 WITH FA/3089/2009 WITH FA/3090/2009 WITH FA/3091/2009

¶45

WITH X-OBJ(ST)/6948/201 IN FA/3086/2009 WITH X-OBJ(ST)/7513/201 IN FA/3089/2009 WITH X-OBJ(ST)/7516/201 IN FA/3090/2009 WITH X-OBJ(ST)/7512/201 IN FA/3087/2009 WITH X-OBJ(ST)/6950/201 IN FA/3091/2009 WITH X-OBJ(ST)/7050/201 IN FA/3084/2009 WITH X-OBJ(ST)/7069/201 IN FA/3085/2009

¶46

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA.

¶47

VERSUS

¶48

SANJIVAN TUKARAM BHOSALE

¶49

11 FIRST APPEAL NO.3088 OF 2009 WITH X-OBJ(ST)/7514/201 IN FA/3088/2009

¶50

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA.

¶51

VERSUS

¶52

KRISHNABAI GANPATI SHINDE

¶53

12 FIRST APPEAL NO.3092 OF 2009 WITH X-OBJ(ST)/7518/201 IN FA/3092/2009

¶54

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶55

VERSUS

¶56

SHRRIDHAR GANPATI BHOSALE

¶57

13 FIRST APPEAL NO.3093 OF 2009 WITH X-OBJ(ST)/7006/201 IN FA/3093/2009

¶58

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶59

VERSUS

¶60

SHANKAR RAMCHANDRA NAVGHARE

¶61

3 Beed.odt

¶62

14 FIRST APPEAL NO.3259 OF 2009

¶63

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS VERSUS ROHIDAS SANGAJI WAGHMARE AND OTHERS

¶64

15 FIRST APPEAL NO.3260 OF 2009

¶65

WITH FA/3261/2009 WITH CA/1245/2008 IN FA/161/2010 WITH FA/161/2010

¶66

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶67

VERSUS

¶68

TRIMBAK HARIBHAU NAWSPUE

¶69

16 FIRST APPEAL NO.160 OF 2010 WITH CA/1243/2008 IN FA/160/2010

¶70

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶71

VERSUS

¶72

BABA NATHU YERKAL

¶73

17 FIRST APPEAL NO.604 OF 2010

¶74

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR BEED AND ANOTHER

¶75

VERSUS

¶76

MANOHAR GOVINDRAO MASKE AND OTHERS

¶77

18 FIRST APPEAL NO.786 OF 2010 WITH FA/788/2010 WITH FA/789/2010 WITH FA/787/2010

¶78

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS

¶79

MURLIDHAR ASHRUBA TATE THR LRS ASHOK AND ANOTHER

¶80

19 FIRST APPEAL NO.1331 OF 2010

¶81

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

¶82

VERSUS

¶83

WAMAN BHANUDAS SASTE L.RS. KISAN WAMAN SASTE AND OTHERS

¶84

20 FIRST APPEAL NO.1334 OF 2010

¶85

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶86

VERSUS

¶87

SAKHARAM VISHWANATH KALE AND OTHERS

¶88

21 FIRST APPEAL NO.1335 OF 2010

¶89

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS VERSUS SHANKAR BABULAL WARWADE AND OTHERS

¶90

4 Beed.odt

¶91

22 FIRST APPEAL NO.1336 OF 2010

¶92

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS VERSUS

¶93

ABASAHEB HARIDASRAO KALE

¶94

23 FIRST APPEAL NO.1851 OF 2010

¶95

WITH FA/1852/2010 WITH FA/1854/2010 WITH FA/1855/2010 WITH FA/1856/2010 WITH FA/1853/2010

¶96

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶97

VERSUS

¶98

NARHARI BHAGOJI GUTTE

¶99

... 24 FIRST APPEAL NO.1934 OF 2010 WITH FA/1935/2010

¶100

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

¶101

VERSUS

¶102

SAYYAD BIBBAN SAYYAD CHAND AND OTHERS

¶103

25 FIRST APPEAL NO.1998 OF 2010 WITH FA/1999/2010

¶104

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶105

VERSUS

¶106

PRALHAD BHEEMRAO YEDE

¶107

26 FIRST APPEAL NO.2121 OF 2010 WITH FA/2120/2010

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

VERSUS

WAMAN MAROTI JADHAV

A.G.P. for Appellants – State : Mr. A.M. Phule

¶112

Advocate for respondents – claimants : Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, Mr. T.B. Bhosale,

¶113

Mr. S.L. Bhapkar

¶114

Officers for Acquiring body/State:Mr. Tushar Thombre, Addl. Collector, Beed and Ms. Nilam Bharat Bafna, Sub-Divisional Officer, Majalgaon, Dist. Beed

¶115

O R D E R

¶116

These Appeals are placed before this Lok Adalat by the appellant – State. Learned A.G.P., concerned officer and learned counsel for the respondents - claimants are present.

¶117

5 Beed.odt

¶118

Mr. A.M. Phule, learned A.G.P. submitted that the above numbered groups of appeals is squarely covered by the Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/ Pra.Kra.4/ Bham-1/ A-4, dated 3^rd November, 2016 with Government Corrigendum, dated 23^rd February, 2017 and 13^th August, 2018 to the said Government Resolution. In turn, these appeals can be withdrawn as per the policy decision taken by the Government of Maharashtra. Accordingly, the State is withdrawing these appeals.

¶119

Learned A.G.P. submits that the entire amount in some of the appeals has been deposited and lateron withdrawn by the original claimants. It is further submitted that in view of withdrawal of amount, nothing survives in those appeals.

¶120

It is informed by learned A.G.P. that in some other appeals the amount is yet to be deposited. Learned A.G.P. prays for one year’s duration for depositing the amount, either before this Court or the concerned reference Court.

¶121

Said request is accepted. The State shall deposit the amount either before this Court or reference Court, preferably within a period of one year from today, failing which the claimants are entitled to execute the awards as permissible in law by claiming interest and other monetary benefits.

¶122

Before disposing the appeals, it is clarified that if any amount is still in deposit with this Court, the same shall be transmitted to the reference Court. The reference Court shall disburse the said amount with accrued interest thereon to the original claimants on their application. The claimants are permitted to make the application before the reference Court for withdrawal of said amount.

¶123

6 Beed.odt

¶124

These First Appeals stand disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

¶125

The Civil Application/s, if any, except the application to bring on record legal heirs and the cross objections, stand/s disposed of.

¶126

Issue full Court fee refund certificate.

¶127

( S.P. Brahme ) ( S.G. Shete ) ( R. G. AVACHAT, J. ) Advocate District Judge (Retd.) Head of the Panel Member Member

¶128

Date : 25.09.2021. Place : Aurangabad.

¶129

RRD/SSD

The State of Maharashtra v. Sayyad Bibban Sayyad Chand and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Maharashtra v. Sayyad Bibban Sayyad Chand and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State of Mah. Vs Narayan Khandu Sirsath and Ors.

The State of Mah and Ors. Vs Dnyanoba Eknath Chauhan

State of Maharashtra Vs Babu Mahada Chaware

Asaram Gangadhar Akat Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Niverti Mahadeorao Late Vs the State of Mah and Ors.

Pandurang Rambhau Zol Vs the State of Mah and Ors.