Maria Vaz v. Eulozio Basil Vaz
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court at Goa restored a dismissed writ petition for a bona fide mistake attributable to the applicant and counsel cited during the lockdown period. The order recalls the previous dismissal and lists the writ for consideration.
What did the court decide?
The order dated 1/3/2021 is recalled and the Criminal Writ petition no. 210 of 2019 is restored to file.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(12) CRMA 36 2021 IN WPCR 210 2019
Aura
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
Criminal Misc. Application No.36 of 2021
In
Criminal Writ Petition No.210 of 2019
MARIA VAZ APPLICANT
Versus
EULOZIO BASIL VAZ
RESPONDENT
Mr. V. V. Mapari , Advocate for the Applicant-Petitioners. Mr. Cliff Fernandes, Advocate for the Respondent-State.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J DATED: 14th October, 2021
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Maria Vaz
- respondent
Eulozio Basil Vaz
Coram
Manish Pitale
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Amir Ali Biriya., Vs State of Goa, Thr. the Public Prosecutro and Anr.
Kishore K. Keswani Vs Aniksha Jaisinghani and 2 Ors.
Nimesh Munshi, Presently in Judicial Custody at Colvale Jail, Colvale, Thr. Rajesh Shirodkar Vs State of Goa, Thr. the Office of the Public Prosecutor and Anr.
Deo Mahadeo Devasthan, Thr. Its Attorney, Rajendra Pandhari Sawant Dessai Vs the State of Goa, Thr. Its Chief Secretary and 4 Ors.