This disposal order of a contempt petition held that the alleged contempt was purged upon compliance with the order, leading to the dismissal of the petition without costs.
Contempt petition dismissed; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
997-cp-385-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONT. PETITION NO.385 OF 2021
IN WP/6562/2019
SAMBHAJI MURLIDHAR TANDALE ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. K. D. Khade h/f Mr. Balasaheb K. Pawar,
Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATED : 13th OCTOBER, 2021.
PER COURT:-
1.It is submitted that, the order of which
the contempt is alleged is complied with.
2.In light of that, contempt stands purged.
3.Contempt Petition is disposed of. No
costs.
(R. N. LADDHA) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/October-2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petitioner had purged the contempt by complying with the impugned order?
Sambhaji Murlidhar Tandale
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court