Disposed

Sadashiv Dnyandev Khadakhade v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Water Resources Department

Bombay HC28 Oct 2021CP/297/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This contempt petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to deposit Rs.46,78,543/- for compensation with the Special Land Acquisition Officer. The petitioner is permitted to raise any shortfall notice.

What did the court decide?

Direction given to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to deposit Rs.46,78,543/- with Special Land Acquisition Officer No.1, Solapur within one week.

Sadashiv Dnyandev Khadakhade Vs the… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

34-cp-297-2021.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 297 OF 2021 IN

¶4

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1175 OF 2019

¶5

Sadashiv Dnyandev Khadakhade

¶6

...Petitioner

¶7

vs.

¶8

The State of Maharashtra

¶9

Through the water Resources Department & 3 Ors.

¶10

...Respondents

¶11

Dr. Ramdas P. Sabban i/b Mr. Ramesh S. Kompelli for petitioner. Mr.V.S. Gokhale, ‘B’ Panel counsel for respondent No.1 and 2. Mr.D.B. Khaire for respondent Nos. 3 and 4. Smt. Shehalata D. Gawade, Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division No.1, Solapur present.

¶12

CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATE : 28^th OCTOBER , 2021

¶13

P.C.:

¶14

Heard the learned counsels for the parties.

¶15

Mr. Khaire, the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 3 and 4

¶16

submits that Smt. Shehalata D. Gawade, Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division No.1, Solapur - respondent No.3, is present in Court.

¶17

The learned counsel, on instructions, submits that the respondent Nos.3 and 4 have computed the amount of compensation payable in accordance with the consent terms, dated 17^th February 2021, and have brought a cheque for the sum of Rs.46,78,543/-. The learned counsel further submits that the

¶18

1/2

¶19

Shraddha Talekar, PS

¶20

34-cp-297-2021.doc

¶21

respondent Nos.3 and 4 are ready to deposit the said amount in the Court, today.

¶22

Mr.Sabban, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 be directed to deposit the said amount of Rs.46,78,543/- with the Special Land Acquisition Offcer No.1, Solapur so as to facilitate the disbursement thereof in accordance with the consent terms.

¶23

Mr. Sabban makes a further grievance that the amount computed by the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 may not be accurate in accordance with the consent terms.

¶24

In view of the aforesaid submissions, the petition stands disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to deposit the amount of Rs.46,78,543/- with the Special Land Acquisition Offcer No.1, Solapur, within a period of one week from today.

¶25

The petitioner is at liberty to bring to the notice of the respondent Nos.3 and 4 shortfall, if any, in the amount of compensation payable under the consent terms and thereupon the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 shall consider the same and take appropriate action in conformity with the consent award.

¶26

2/2

¶27

Shraddha Talekar, PS

Sadashiv Dnyandev Khadakhade v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Water Resources Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sadashiv Dnyandev Khadakhade v. the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Water Resources Department

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Indu Lasers Pvt. Ltd. vs Meritt Transmission, Partnership Firm

Mr. Sagar Ramakant Chevale Vs Iffko Tokiyo Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd. and Anr.

Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, Mumbai Vs Sonali Hemant Gawade and Ors.

Sadashiv Dnyandev Khadakhade Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Water Resources Department

The Divisional Officer, the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Mr. Arshad Ahmad Shakil Ahmad and Ors.

Itochu India Private Limited Vs Narendra Plastic Private Limited