Itochu India Private Limited v. Narendra Plastic Private Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment allows the amendment to implead Mr. Neemit Punamiya as Defendant No. 2 in a commercial summary suit. Upon receiving consent and confirming settlement terms are agreed, the court decrees the suit based on the Consent Terms.
What did the court decide?
Amendment allowed to implead Mr. Neemit Punamiya; Suit decreed in accordance with Consent Terms.
What the court decided
19-COMSS49-14.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMM SUMMARY SUIT NO. 49 OF 2014
Itochu India Private Ltd. ...Plaintiff
Versus
Narendra Plastic Private Ltd. …Defendant
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2021.10.30 19:00:10 +0530
- Mr. Aditya Mehta, a/w Mr. Pritvish Shetty, Ms. Saloni Jain, i/ b Cyril Amarchand Mangalda, for the Plaintiff.
- Mr. Kentaro Takeda, Authorised Representative of the Plaintiff, present.
- Ms. Jyoti Sinha, a/w Raj Panchmatia, C. Nageshwaran, i/b Khaitan & Co., for the Defendant.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Plaintiff is permitted to implead Mr. Neemit Punamiya as Defendant No. 2 via amendment.
Whether the suit should be decreed in accordance with the settled Consent Terms.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
Narendra Plastic Private Ltd.
- respondent
Neemit Punamiya
Coram
N. J. Jamadar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Sadashiv Dnyandev Khadakhade Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Water Resources Department
Sadashiv Dnyandev Khadakhade Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Water Resources Department
Suresh Indu Lasers Pvt. Ltd. vs Meritt Transmission, Partnership Firm
The Divisional Officer, the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Mr. Arshad Ahmad Shakil Ahmad and Ors.