The applicant withdrew Civil Application No.1059 of 2019, which was filed to expedite the hearing of a suit. The court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the application. No substantive issue of law was argued.
Civil Application No.1059 of 2019 allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28.caw.1059.19 in wp.9913.17.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1059 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.9913 OF 2017
Abdul Razzak Sunesra .. Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Abdul Razzal Sunesra .. Petitioner Versus Anil Vijay Madgaonkar .. Respondent
Mr. Hassan Khan, Advocate for the Applicant / Petitioner.
Mr. Prashant Darandale a/w. Surel Shah, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : MARCH 03 2021.
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Khan, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.
Darandale, learned counsel for the respondent.
2019 is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of accordingly.
1 of 1
Ravindra Digitally signedby Ravindra M. M. Amberkar Amberkar Date: 2021.03.0317:37:11 +0530
Abdul Razzak Sunesra
Anil Vijay Madgaonkar
Milind N. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
