This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28.caw.1059.19 in wp.9913.17.doc
Ajay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1059 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.9913 OF 2017
Abdul Razzak Sunesra.. Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Abdul Razzal Sunesra.. Petitioner
Versus
Anil Vijay Madgaonkar.. Respondent
...................
Mr. Hassan Khan, Advocate for the Applicant / Petitioner.
Mr. Prashant Darandale a/w. Surel Shah, Advocate for the
Respondent.
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : MARCH 03 2021.
P.C.:
Heard Mr. Khan, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.
Darandale, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. Mr. Khan learned counsel for the applicant submits on
instructions that he desires to withdraw Civil Application No.1059 of
2019. The said Civil Application has been filed for expediting the
hearing of the suit before the trial Court.
3. In view of the above statement, Civil Application No.1059 of
2019 is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of accordingly.
[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
1 of 1
Ravindra Digitally signedby Ravindra M. M. Amberkar Amberkar Date: 2021.03.0317:37:11 +0530
Abdul Razzal Sunesra
Abdul Razzal Sunesra
Anil Vijay Madgaonkar
MILIND N. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court