Disposed

Shri Saibaba Sansthan Shirdi through Its Chief Executive Officer v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC7 Jul 2021CA/4673/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court Bench at Aurangabad disposed of two civil applications seeking permission to continue incentive payments to doctors as per a 2018 government-sanctioned scheme without requiring fresh approval for subsequent periods.

What did the court decide?

Permitted the Sansthan to continue with the incentives given to doctors in terms of the Government Resolution dated 27.06.2018.

Shri Saibaba Sansthan Shirdi through Its Chief… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1 ca 4673&5191.2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4673 OF 2021

¶4

IN

¶5

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 120 OF 2019

¶6

SHRI SAIBABA SANSTHAN SHIRDI

¶7

VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶8

Advocate for Applicant: Mr. A. S. Bajaj
GP for Respondent/State: Mr. D. R. Kale
Advocate for Non-Applicant No.7: Mr. Ajinkya Kale
h/f. Mr. S. B. Talekar and Mr. K. M. Nagarkar

¶9

WITH

¶10

…
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5191 OF 2021
IN
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4673 OF 2021

¶11

IN

¶12

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 120 OF 2019
DR. VIDYA MANOHAR BORADE AND OTHERS

¶13

VERSUS

¶14

SHRI SAI BABA SANSTHAN TRUST SHIRDI AND OTHERS

¶15

Advocate for Applicant: Mr. V. D. Sapkal, Senior
Advocate h/f. Mr. Chormal A. B.

¶16

GP for Respondent/State: Mr. D. R. Kale

¶17

Advocate for Non-Applicant No.7: Mr. Ajinkya Kale
h/f. Mr. S. B. Talekar and Mr. K. M. Nagarkar

¶18

CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

¶19

DATE:07th JULY, 2021

¶20

PER COURT:

¶21

1.Civil Application No. 4673 of 2021 is filed

¶22

seeking permission to implement the Resolution

¶23

2 ca 4673&5191.2021

¶24

No. 580/3 dated 19.12.2020 adopted by the Ad-hoc
Committee for giving incentives to the Doctors
working in Shri Saibaba and Shri Sainath Rugnalay.

¶25

2.We have heard Mr. Bajaj, learned Counsel for

¶26

the applicant, the learned Counsel for the
original writ petitioner and Mr. Sapkal, learned
Senior Advocate for the Intervenors of Civil
Application No. 5191 of 2021.

¶27

3.The permission, it appears, is sought to give
incentives to the Doctors working in Shri Saibaba

¶28

Super Speciality Rugnalay and Shri Sainath
Rugnalay.

¶29

4.The Government under it’s Resolution dated
27.06.2018 has approved the incentives to be given
to the Doctors as per the decision taken by the
management of the Sansthan. It is submitted that
up to March-2020 incentives has been paid and
permission is sought to pay the incentives up to
October-2020 and to continue it further.

¶30

3 ca 4673&5191.2021

¶31

5.In view of the fact that the Government under
it’s Resolution dated 27.06.2018 sanctioned the
incentives and that incentives were given to the
Doctors earlier, we permit the Sansthan to
continue with the incentives given to the Doctors
in terms of the Government Resolution dated

¶32

27.06.2018.

¶33

6.Civil Application No. 4673 of 2021 and Civil
Application No. 5191 of 2021 are accordingly
disposed of.

¶34

[R. N. LADDHA, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
marathe

Shri Saibaba Sansthan Shirdi through Its Chief Executive Officer v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Saibaba Sansthan Shirdi through Its Chief Executive Officer v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohiddin Inamdar Sheikh Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Others

Ramesh Jayawant Desale Vs National Highway Authority of India and Another

Bhatu Tanku Sonwane Vs National Highway Authority of India and Another

Digvijay Enterprises Nashik Thr Its Proprietor Sahebrao Damu Shewale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Omkar Ganpat Dahiwade Under Guardian of Real Sister Priyanka Ganpat Dahiwade and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Vidya Manohar Borade and Others Vs Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust Shirdi through Its Chief Executive Officer and Others