Allowed

Mohiddin Inamdar Sheikh v. the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Others

Bombay HC5 Jul 2021WP/4993/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner, a retired government employee, sought to nominate his second wife as the recipient of family pension after his first wife's death. The respondents rejected the application due to retirement. The Court held that retirement does not bar nomination of a family member and directed the respondents to decide the application on merits within four months upon product

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of; the respondents were directed to decide the petitioner's application for changing nominee within four months on merits after verifying documents.

Mohiddin Inamdar Sheikh Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

WP No. 4993/21

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

62 WRIT PETITION NO.4993 OF 2021

¶5

MOHIDDIN INAMDAR SHEIKH VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶7

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R.P. Bhumkar AGP for Respondent 1/ State: Mr. P.G. Borade Advocate for Respondents 2 to 4 : Mr. S.B. Parnere

¶8

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & R.N. LADDHA, JJ. DATED : 05/07/2021.

¶9

PER COURT :

¶10

. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has retired from service and is receiving the pension. He has nominated his wife namely Shaikh Sagira as a nominee to receive the family pension. Said Shaikh Sagira died in the year 2013. The petitioner thereafter married with one Shaikh Reshma on 18.10.2015. The application fled by the petitioner to accept Shaikh Reshma as his nominee is not entertained by the respondents.

¶11

The learned advocate for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 submits that succession certifcate has not been produced by the petitioner. There is no specifc provisions in the Rules for

¶12

WP No. 4993/21

¶13

¶14

entering the name of nominee after the retirement. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 4 that under Rule 114, the provision exists for production of succession certifcate to claim the pension.

¶15

We have considered the submissions canvassed by the learned counsel for the parties. The nominee can only be a person from the family, if the Government employee has a family. If the Government employee possesses a family, then the nominee cannot be a person other than the family member.

¶16

In the present case, it appears that the petitioner has nominated his frst wife Shaikh Sagira as nominee. Shaikh Sagira died in the year 2013 and the petitioner claims to have married with Shaikh Reshma on 18.10.2015. The petitioner is relying upon the marriage certifcate to substantiate his contention.

¶17

After the death of Shaikh Sagira, naturally the petitioner is entitled to marry and his wife is entitled for being placed as a nominee. The respondents will have to get the proof about the death of Shaikh Sagira and for that purpose, they may insist upon the death certifcate of Shaikh Sagira issued by the

¶18

WP No. 4993/21

¶19

¶20

competent authority. If the petitioner produces all such papers/documents before respondent Nos. 2 to 4, then the respondent Nos. 2 to 4 shall not reject the application of the petitioner for change of nominee only on the ground that the petitioner has retired from service. The application of the petitioner shall be decided on it’s own merits after satisfying that the petitioner married with Shaikh Reshma after the death of frst wife. The said application be decided preferably within four months. While considering the application, the impugned order would not be an impediment.

¶21

Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶22

[ R.N. LADDHA, J. ] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]

¶23

ssc/

Mohiddin Inamdar Sheikh v. the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohiddin Inamdar Sheikh v. the State of Maharashtra Thr the Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nandurbar Education Society Nandurbar through Chairman Girish Vishwambar Kunte Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Nandurbar Education Society Nandurbar through Chairman Girish Vishwambar Kunte Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Shri Lokmanya Tilak Shikshan Sanstha Wasmatnagar through President Raghvendra Vishvanath Joshi Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vaishnavi Sunil Ramod Thr Father and Natural Guardian Sunil Narayan Ramod Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Shashank Shivaji Balshetwar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Harshvardhan Maheshkumar Meghmale Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another