Application allowed for substitution of applicant in a writ petition regarding notice to remove a petrol pump. Case listed for final hearing; corporation directed to record affidavit on nearby petrol pumps.
Substitution of applicant in Writ Petition No. 5872 of 2007 allowed. Prayer clauses C, D, and E declared infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
902 CA-4276.2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
902 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4276 OF 2021 IN WP/5872/2007 WITH CA/7530/2012 IN WP/5872/2007 WITH WP/5872/2007
SWATI VILAS UBALE VERSUS RUMI DINSHAW PRINTER AND OTHERS
Mr. S.P. Brahme, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. A.P. Bhandari, Advocate for respondent No. 1. Mr. D.G. Nagode, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Mr. J.R. Shah, Advocate for respondent No. 4. Smt. R.S. Kulkarni, Advocate holding for Mr. S.D. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No. 7.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND S.G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 03-09-2021
ORDER :
(2)
902 CA-4276.2021.odt
respondents do not have an objection, only to the extent of substitution.
(S.G. MEHARE, J.)
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
VD_Dhirde
Digitally signed by VIJAY VIJAY DADASAHEB DADASAHEB DHIRDE DHIRDE Date: 2021.09.06 10:08:47 +0530
SWATI VILAS UBALE
RUMI DINSHAW PRINTER
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
S.G. MEHARE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
