The High Court allowed the unconditional withdrawal of a bail application filed by the applicant, who had been in custody since January 2015. The court directed the trial judge to expedite the trial.
Application allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally; trial directed to be expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
33ba485.odt
1 / 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.485 OF 2021
Shanno Jahan Mohd.Idrisi Shaikh... Applicant
versus
State of Maharashtra.... Respondent
…....
Mr. Aniket Vagal Advocate for Applicant.Mr.Mr.S.H.Yadav, APP for the State/Respondent.CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 11th JUNE, 2021
(Through video conferencing)
P.C. :
1. After arguing the matter for some time when I
expressed my disinclination to grant relief, learned counsel for
the applicant prays for unconditional withdrawal of this
application. However, he submits that applicant is in custody
since 25.1.2015 and therefore, trial be expedited. This request
is reasonable.
2. Application is allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally.
Pathak
33ba485.odt
2 / 2
3. Learned trial Judge is directed to expedite the trial and proceed
to the next stage as early as possible.
4. Application is disposed of.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally.
Shanno Jahan Mohd. Idrisi Shaikh
State of Maharashtra
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court