This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
5.BA -390-2021.doc
IN TH E H IG H C O U RT O F JU D IC A TU RE A T BO M BA Y C RIM IN A L A PPE LLA TE JU RIS D IC TIO N
Bail Application No. 390 / 2021
A li A ktar @ A ktar Fayas Jaffari.. A pplicant
Versus.
The S tate of Maharashtra
.. Respondent
****
Mr. D eepak G autam, Advocate for the A pplicant.
Mr. A jay Patil, A PP for S tate.
****
CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.
DATE : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2021.
Per Court : -
O n expressing disinclination to grant the bail, learned C ounsel
for the A pplicant on instructions, seeks leave to w ithdraw the
application, unconditionally. A pplication is disposed of as w ithdraw n.
Digitally signed MOHAMMAD by MOHAMMAD (S A N D EEP K. S H IN D E, J.) NAJEEB NAJEEBMOHAMMAD MOHAMMAD QAYYUM QAYYUM Date: 2021.09.01 19:03:28 +0530
Najeeb..
1/1
Ali Aktar @ Aktar Fayas Jaffari
The State of Maharashtra
SANDEEP K. SHINDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court