Disposed

Kiran Gyanba Chaudhary v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC18 Feb 2021BA/387/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court Bombay declined bail in an earlier application. In the present application, the applicant prayed for withdrawal with a direction to expedite trial. Court allowed withdrawal and directed trial court to complete trial by December 2021.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed to be withdrawn unconditionally; trial Court directed to complete trial by end of December 2021.

Kiran Gyanba Chaudhary Vs the State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1 / 2

¶2

9 BA 387-2020.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 387 OF 2020

¶5

Kiran Gyanba Chaudhary.... Applicant
versus
The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent

¶6

Mr. Satyavrat Joshi, for Applicant.
Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for State/Respondent.

¶7

CORAM: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
DATE: 18th FEBRUARY, 2021

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

. The applicant had earlier approached this Court for his
release on bail by filing Criminal Bail Application No.717/2019.
The matter was heard and when I expressed my disinclination to
grant relief, the then learned Counsel for the applicant had prayed
for withdrawal of that application. Therefore, vide Order dated
24th September 2019 the application was allowed to be
withdrawn. However, the Trial was expedited.

¶10

2. In the present application, the same prayer is made.
After arguing for some time again, when I expressed my
disinclination to grant relief, the learned Counsel for the applicant,
on instructions, prays for unconditional withdrawal of this
application but with a request that the directions be issued to the

¶11

Manjusha

¶12

2 / 2 9 BA 387-2020.odt

¶13

trial Court to complete the trial in a time bound manner.

¶14

3. Since the prayer is made for withdrawal, I am
permitting the learned Counsel for the applicant to withdraw this
application unconditionally. However, as I had directed vide Order
dated 24th September 2019 for the trial to be expedited and since
the trial has not even commenced since then, the trial Court is
directed to take up this matter for disposal as expeditiously as
possible. The trial Court should make efforts to conclude the trial
before end of December 2021.

¶15

4. The application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶16

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

Kiran Gyanba Chaudhary v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kiran Gyanba Chaudhary v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Vasant Dhaigude Vs the State of Maharashtra

Salimunisa Asif Shaikh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sagar Krushnappa Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dattatraya (Raju) Ravindra Hande Vs the State of Maharashtra

Kalyanrao Jagannath Jadhav Vs the State of Maharashtra

Akash Sunil Kumbhar Vs the State of Maharashtra