Applicant, in custody for four years with the trial commenced, sought bail. The court held that entertaining the bail application was not necessary as the trial has begun with prosecution witnesses examined. The application was disposed of.
The bail application has been disposed of. No specific relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30 BA 271-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 271 OF 2021
Mr. Sagar Baburao Dhulap
… Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Ms. Babita P. Pandey, for the Applicant.
Mrs. Anamika Malhotra, APP for the Respondent – State.
PC :
.Learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant
is in custody for a period of about four years. The trial has begun.
The prosecution has examined 20 witnesses and about 4 to 5
witnesses are remaining. In these circumstances, the question of
entertaining this application for bail does not arise. However, it is
expected that the trial Court would conclude the trial expeditiously.
2. Application stands disposed of accordingly.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
1 of 1
Manjusha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to an applicant in custody for about four years where the trial has begun and prosecution witnesses are remaining.
Sagar Baburao Dhulap
The State of Maharashtra
PRAKASH D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court