Upon the submission that the applicant had already been released on bail on parole and was at liberty, the High Court allowed the bail application to be withdrawn. Consequently, the application stands disposed of.
Application allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to prefer application as and when need arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
50- BA-88-2020.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2020
Mayur Ramabhai Bhandari � Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra � Respondent
Mr. Virendra V. Pethe , Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. Y. M. Nakhwa, APP for the Respondent – State.
CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.
DATE: 23rd MARCH, 2021
PER COURT:
Digitally signed by RajeP. RajeP. AherDate: Aher 2021.03.25 21:22:34 +0530
.Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the
applicant has been released on bail on parole. Since he is at liberty
the application may be allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to
prefer application as and when need arises. In view of submission,
application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Application stands disposed of accordingly.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.)
1 of 1
Sajakali Jamadar
Mayur Ramabhai Bhandari
The State of Maharashtra
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court