In a bail application filed after the charge-sheet was filed, the High Court held that no special reasons existed to entertain the prayer directly. The applicant was directed to approach the trial court for release on bail in the changed circumstances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
38-BA-1578-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1578 OF 2021
Sagar Uttam Gholap .... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent
Mr. Priyal G. Sarda,for the applicant. Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for the State/Respondent.
CORAM:SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 16th JUNE, 2021 (Through Video Conferencing)
P.C. :
during pendency of this application charge-sheet is fled. He seeks leave to annex the charge-sheet.
y.s.patil
1 of 2
38-BA-1578-2021.odt
the charge-sheet was fled.
4. The application is disposed of accordingly.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
y.s.patil
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a bail application filed after the filing of the charge-sheet should be entertained directly by the High Court or dismissed to be approached at the trial court.
Sagar Uttam Gholap
The State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
