Disposed

Satish Bhikaram Wayase v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC16 Jun 2021ABA/1132/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application was allowed by the High Court. The applicant was granted permission to withdraw the application unconditionally, subject to a notice period for future arrest.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw application unconditionally. Applicant must attend police call and cooperate. Investigating agency required to give four clear working days' notice for future arrest.

Satish Bhikaram Wayase Vs the State of Maharashtra — Anticipatory Bail | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1-ABA-1132-2021.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1132 OF 2021

¶4

Satish Bhikaram Wayase .... Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent

¶5

Mr. S.B. Talekar i/b Talekar and Associates, for the applicant.

¶6

Mr. S.H. Yadav, APP for the State/Respondent. PI Mr. Namdeo Shinde, Baramati City Police station present.

¶7

CORAM:SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 16^th JUNE, 2021

¶8

P.C. :

¶9

The Applicant is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with C.R.No. 644 of 2020 registered at Baramati Police Station, Pune on 27/12/2020, under sections 417, 468, 471,477 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

Heard Mr. S.B. Talekar, learned counsel for the

y.s.patil

1 of 3

1-ABA-1132-2021.odt

applicant and Mr. S.H. Yadav, learned APP for the State.

¶15

At the outset learned APP Shri Yadav, on instructions of the Investigating Ofcer PI Namdeo Shinde makes a statement that the investigating agency does not want to arrest the applicant in this case. It would be sufcient that if the applicant attends the Police Station as and when called and also give his specimen signature and specimen hand writing.

¶16

Learned Counsel for the applicant is agreeable to this statement. He states that the applicant shall attend the concerned Police station as and when called. He shall co-operate with the investigation. He shall give his specimen handwriting and specimen signature.

¶17

Statements of both sides are noted and recorded. In view of this, learned Counsel for the applicant Shri Talekar prays for withdrawal of this application. Permission is granted. Application is allowed

2 of 3

y.s.patil

1-ABA-1132-2021.odt

to be withdrawn unconditionally. It is made clear that if in future, if the investigating agency decides to arrest the present applicant,the Investigating agency shall give four clear working days’ notice to the applicant to enable him to approach appropriate Court for appropriate relief .

¶22

The Application stands disposed of accordingly.

¶23

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)

¶24

y.s.patil

¶25

3 of 3

Satish Bhikaram Wayase v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satish Bhikaram Wayase v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Baburao Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sachin Bhagwan Bhilare Vs the State of Maharashtra

Dayaram Babasaheb Gaikwad Vs the State of Maharashtra

Ganesh Jagannath Tikole Vs the State of Maharashtra

Shankarava Sangappa Kumbhar Vs the State of Maharashtra

Sagar Uttam Gholap Vs the State of Maharashtra